Toomey Opening Statement During Commerce, HUD Nomination Hearing
Washington, D.C. – During today’s U.S. Senate Banking Committee hearing, Ranking Member Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) urged Mr. Arun Venkataraman, nominee for Assistant Secretary of Commerce and Director General of the United States and Foreign Commercial Service, to effectively support U.S. exporters overseas and attract foreign investment to the U.S.
Senator
Toomey also pressed Mr. Damon Smith, nominee for General Counsel at the
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), to ensure HUD faithfully
complies with the law and conducts thorough oversight of how it spends taxpayer
dollars.
Ranking Member Toomey’s opening remarks, as prepared for delivery:
Mr.
Chairman, thank you.
Mr.
Venkataraman and Mr. Smith, welcome to you both. You’ve been nominated for
important leadership positions at the Commerce Department and HUD.
At
Commerce, the Director General of the U.S. and Foreign Commercial Service and
Assistant Secretary for Global Markets must stand up for the interests of U.S.
exporters overseas. This includes addressing barriers to entry in foreign
markets and attracting foreign direct investment, known as FDI, into the U.S.
Many U.S. businesses and jobs depend upon exports. This position is critically
important right now as COVID-19 led to the imposition of new trade barriers and
a sharp decline in global FDI.
The
Assistant Secretary will face a host of challenges right off the bat. The
previous administration’s trade wars alienated our allies. For example, many of
them imposed retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports after Section 232 tariffs
labeled their steel and aluminum exports a “national security threat.”
“Buy
American” policies that seek to limit foreign access to U.S. government
procurement contracts have caused our trading partners to threaten to do the
same, potentially taking away a major export market for U.S. businesses.
Foreign countries also frequently impose non-tariff technical barriers to trade,
to limit U.S. entry and protect their domestic industries. The Assistant
Secretary must oversee efforts to convince foreign governments to overcome
these concerns, remove these obstacles, and allow our businesses market access.
Another
major responsibility of the Assistant Secretary is to oversee U.S. government
efforts to attract FDI into the U.S. The U.S. has long been a magnet for FDI,
due to our skilled workforce, broad capital markets, strong legal protections
for investors, and attractive business environment. But FDI has faced
challenges due to COVID-19. In 2020, global FDI fell 42% according to UN
Conference on Trade and Development.
In
addition, the Biden administration is making attracting FDI more difficult. The
administration has proposed burdensome regulations and corporate taxes that
would make it less desirable to invest in the U.S. And the administration’s
support for a waiver of IP protections for vaccines sends a worrying signal to
investors in IP-intensive industries.
If
confirmed, I expect you to use your position to promote policies that will
achieve the mission entrusted to you. That means giving a voice to U.S.
exporters in the administration’s policy decisions and advocating for policies
that make the U.S. an attractive destination for foreign direct investment.
Now
turning to HUD: HUD’s General Counsel plays an important role advising the
agency on what it can and cannot do. HUD needs a General Counsel who will help
ensure effective oversight of the federal tax dollars it spends. That means
rooting out waste, fraud, and abuse. This is critically important given the $60
billion given to HUD this past year and the $68 billion requested for the next
fiscal year.
Unfortunately,
HUD is already making poor choices on this front. For example, the agency has
made it easier for illegal immigrants to get emergency housing vouchers by
waiving regulations that require verification of citizenship or legal
immigration status. In addition, HUD removed sensible restrictions on Puerto
Rico’s use of disaster recovery funds. These restrictions required Puerto Rico
to spend these funds in tranches and to have expenditures reviewed by an
independent financial monitor. By eliminating these requirements, HUD is all
but guaranteeing that a government with chronic financial mismanagement
problems will misspend taxpayer dollars.
The
General Counsel must ensure HUD is complying with the law despite political
pressures. In other words, he can’t be a “yes” man. What does that mean in
practice?
First,
the General Counsel needs to push back on policies that are inconsistent with
the law. Unfortunately, we’ve seen HUD ignore the law recently. For example,
Congress has explicitly prevented any part of a borrower’s down payment for a
FHA loan from being financed by an entity benefiting from the mortgage
transaction. But, as I noted in a recent letter to HUD, the agency continues to
turn a blind eye to circular funding schemes where FHA borrowers finance their
own down payment assistance in contravention of the law.
Second,
the General Counsel needs to ensure all legal requirements with respect to
rulemaking and guidance are followed. That means meaningfully considering all
input from stakeholders, preparing all supporting materials to accompany
significant policy guidance, and completing regulatory impact analyses which
describe the economic burdens on stakeholders.
Third,
the General Counsel needs to be readily available and work with Congress to
ensure laws are faithfully implemented. That includes responding fully to
oversight requests that come from Congress, specifically members of the Banking
Committee.
Let
me close by saying: Mr. Venkataraman, I look forward to hearing how you plan to
effectively support U.S. exporters overseas and attract foreign investment to
the U.S. Mr. Smith, I look forward to hearing how you will ensure that HUD
faithfully complies with the law and conducts thorough oversight of how it
spends taxpayer dollars. If confirmed, you both will have important missions to
fulfill.
###
Next Article Previous Article